Kane County, UT community profile: poverty, income, insurance & broadband (ACS 2020–2024)
Utah county profiles · GEOID 49025
Free community demographics for grant writers, nonprofits and planners. These are period estimates, not current counts. Comparisons are descriptive; no statistical significance is implied.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2020-2024 5-year Data Profiles (2024 endpoint), tables DP02, DP03 and DP05. Estimate and MOE variable IDs appear below. Retrieved 2026-10-19. Census Data Profiles source.
Ready-to-paste need statements
Keep the source, population definition and uncertainty when reusing these sentences. How to use these in a needs statement.
- In Kane County, 9.5% (±3.1 percentage points) of people for whom poverty status was determined lived below the poverty line, compared with 8.5% in Utah and 12.5% nationally (ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimates; DP03_0128PE). Interpret with caution: large relative MOE.
- In Kane County, 12.0% (±10.0 percentage points) of children under 18 for whom poverty status was determined lived below the poverty line, compared with 8.8% in Utah and 16.1% nationally (ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimates; DP03_0129PE). Interpret with caution: large relative MOE.
- In Kane County, 5.3% (±2.3 percentage points) of the civilian noninstitutionalized population had no health insurance coverage, compared with 8.4% in Utah and 8.4% nationally (ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimates; DP03_0099PE). Interpret with caution: large relative MOE.
- In Kane County, median household income was $77,092 (±$11,572) in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars, compared with $95,166 in Utah and $80,734 nationally (ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimates; DP03_0062E).
- In Kane County, 90.4% (±3.4 percentage points) of households had a broadband Internet subscription, compared with 93.4% in Utah and 91.0% nationally (ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimates; DP02_0154PE).
- In Kane County, 16.7% (±3.4 percentage points) of the civilian noninstitutionalized population had a disability, compared with 10.6% in Utah and 13.3% nationally (ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimates; DP02_0072PE).
18 community indicators
± denotes the 90% margin of error (MOE). Percentage MOEs use percentage points (pp). Read definitions and cautions.
| Indicator and population | County ± MOE | Utah ± MOE | US ± MOE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total populationDP05_0001E / DP05_0001M · Total population | 8,170MOE unavailableOfficial controlled total (no MOE) | 3,392,331MOE unavailableOfficial controlled total (no MOE) | 334,922,499MOE unavailableOfficial controlled total (no MOE) |
| Under age 5DP05_0005PE / DP05_0005PM · Total population | 4.8% ± 0.2 pp | 6.9% ± 0.1 pp | 5.6% ± 0.1 pp |
| Under age 18DP05_0019PE / DP05_0019PM · Total population | 20.8% ± 0.8 pp | 27.8% ± 0.1 pp | 22.0% ± 0.1 pp |
| Age 65 and overDP05_0024PE / DP05_0024PM · Total population | 24.7% ± 1.5 pp | 11.9% ± 0.1 pp | 17.2% ± 0.1 pp |
| Total householdsDP02_0001E / DP02_0001M · Households | 3,456 ± 280 | 1,124,822 ± 2,819 | 129,227,496 ± 209,365 |
| Median household incomeDP03_0062E / DP03_0062M · Households | $77,092 ± $11,572 | $95,166 ± $774 | $80,734 ± $166 |
| Per capita incomeDP03_0088E / DP03_0088M · Total population | $39,226 ± $4,298 | $40,873 ± $264 | $44,673 ± $122 |
| Poverty rateDP03_0128PE / DP03_0128PM · Population for whom poverty status is determined | 9.5% ± 3.1 ppInterpret with caution: large relative MOE. | 8.5% ± 0.2 pp | 12.5% ± 0.1 pp |
| Child poverty rateDP03_0129PE / DP03_0129PM · Population under 18 for whom poverty status is determined | 12.0% ± 10.0 ppInterpret with caution: large relative MOE. | 8.8% ± 0.4 pp | 16.1% ± 0.2 pp |
| Unemployment rateDP03_0009PE / DP03_0009PM · Civilian labor force age 16 and over | 3.7% ± 2.8 ppInterpret with caution: large relative MOE. | 3.6% ± 0.1 pp | 5.2% ± 0.1 pp |
| UninsuredDP03_0099PE / DP03_0099PM · Civilian noninstitutionalized population | 5.3% ± 2.3 ppInterpret with caution: large relative MOE. | 8.4% ± 0.2 pp | 8.4% ± 0.1 pp |
| Households receiving SNAPDP03_0074PE / DP03_0074PM · Households | 2.4% ± 1.9 ppInterpret with caution: large relative MOE. | 5.2% ± 0.2 pp | 12.1% ± 0.1 pp |
| High school graduate or higherDP02_0067PE / DP02_0067PM · Population age 25 and over | 93.9% ± 2.1 pp | 93.4% ± 0.1 pp | 89.6% ± 0.1 pp |
| Bachelor’s degree or higherDP02_0068PE / DP02_0068PM · Population age 25 and over | 28.8% ± 5.1 pp | 37.7% ± 0.4 pp | 35.7% ± 0.2 pp |
| Broadband subscriptionDP02_0154PE / DP02_0154PM · Households | 90.4% ± 3.4 pp | 93.4% ± 0.2 pp | 91.0% ± 0.1 pp |
| DisabilityDP02_0072PE / DP02_0072PM · Civilian noninstitutionalized population | 16.7% ± 3.4 pp | 10.6% ± 0.2 pp | 13.3% ± 0.1 pp |
| Civilian veteransDP02_0070PE / DP02_0070PM · Civilian population age 18 and over | 9.4% ± 2.8 pp | 4.6% ± 0.1 pp | 6.2% ± 0.1 pp |
| Speak English less than very wellDP02_0115PE / DP02_0115PM · Population age 5 and over | 1.2% ± 1.0 ppInterpret with caution: large relative MOE. | 5.2% ± 0.1 pp | 8.6% ± 0.1 pp |
Download free county CSV — one county, all 18 indicators, MOEs, status flags and benchmarks.
Similar population in Utah
Up to six other counties closest by absolute population difference; these are not geographic neighbors.
- Beaver County — 7,273 residents
- Grand County — 9,754 residents
- Emery County — 10,046 residents
- Garfield County — 5,219 residents
- Juab County — 12,586 residents
- Morgan County — 12,802 residents