Tuscola County, MI community profile: poverty, income, insurance & broadband (ACS 2020–2024)
Michigan county profiles · GEOID 26157
Free community demographics for grant writers, nonprofits and planners. These are period estimates, not current counts. Comparisons are descriptive; no statistical significance is implied.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2020-2024 5-year Data Profiles (2024 endpoint), tables DP02, DP03 and DP05. Estimate and MOE variable IDs appear below. Retrieved 2026-10-19. Census Data Profiles source.
Ready-to-paste need statements
Keep the source, population definition and uncertainty when reusing these sentences. How to use these in a needs statement.
- In Tuscola County, 12.8% (±1.2 percentage points) of people for whom poverty status was determined lived below the poverty line, compared with 13.2% in Michigan and 12.5% nationally (ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimates; DP03_0128PE).
- In Tuscola County, 16.1% (±2.9 percentage points) of children under 18 for whom poverty status was determined lived below the poverty line, compared with 17.6% in Michigan and 16.1% nationally (ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimates; DP03_0129PE).
- In Tuscola County, 4.6% (±0.6 percentage points) of the civilian noninstitutionalized population had no health insurance coverage, compared with 4.9% in Michigan and 8.4% nationally (ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimates; DP03_0099PE).
- In Tuscola County, median household income was $63,811 (±$1,903) in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars, compared with $72,875 in Michigan and $80,734 nationally (ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimates; DP03_0062E).
- In Tuscola County, 85.1% (±1.3 percentage points) of households had a broadband Internet subscription, compared with 90.5% in Michigan and 91.0% nationally (ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimates; DP02_0154PE).
- In Tuscola County, 19.6% (±0.9 percentage points) of the civilian noninstitutionalized population had a disability, compared with 14.3% in Michigan and 13.3% nationally (ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimates; DP02_0072PE).
18 community indicators
± denotes the 90% margin of error (MOE). Percentage MOEs use percentage points (pp). Read definitions and cautions.
| Indicator and population | County ± MOE | Michigan ± MOE | US ± MOE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total populationDP05_0001E / DP05_0001M · Total population | 52,980MOE unavailableOfficial controlled total (no MOE) | 10,077,761MOE unavailableOfficial controlled total (no MOE) | 334,922,499MOE unavailableOfficial controlled total (no MOE) |
| Under age 5DP05_0005PE / DP05_0005PM · Total population | 4.9% ± 0.1 pp | 5.4% ± 0.1 pp | 5.6% ± 0.1 pp |
| Under age 18DP05_0019PE / DP05_0019PM · Total population | 20.1%MOE unavailableOfficial controlled total (no MOE) | 21.2% ± 0.1 pp | 22.0% ± 0.1 pp |
| Age 65 and overDP05_0024PE / DP05_0024PM · Total population | 21.9% ± 0.1 pp | 18.6% ± 0.1 pp | 17.2% ± 0.1 pp |
| Total householdsDP02_0001E / DP02_0001M · Households | 21,498 ± 287 | 4,076,369 ± 8,399 | 129,227,496 ± 209,365 |
| Median household incomeDP03_0062E / DP03_0062M · Households | $63,811 ± $1,903 | $72,875 ± $293 | $80,734 ± $166 |
| Per capita incomeDP03_0088E / DP03_0088M · Total population | $32,616 ± $903 | $40,735 ± $166 | $44,673 ± $122 |
| Poverty rateDP03_0128PE / DP03_0128PM · Population for whom poverty status is determined | 12.8% ± 1.2 pp | 13.2% ± 0.2 pp | 12.5% ± 0.1 pp |
| Child poverty rateDP03_0129PE / DP03_0129PM · Population under 18 for whom poverty status is determined | 16.1% ± 2.9 pp | 17.6% ± 0.4 pp | 16.1% ± 0.2 pp |
| Unemployment rateDP03_0009PE / DP03_0009PM · Civilian labor force age 16 and over | 6.0% ± 1.0 pp | 5.7% ± 0.1 pp | 5.2% ± 0.1 pp |
| UninsuredDP03_0099PE / DP03_0099PM · Civilian noninstitutionalized population | 4.6% ± 0.6 pp | 4.9% ± 0.1 pp | 8.4% ± 0.1 pp |
| Households receiving SNAPDP03_0074PE / DP03_0074PM · Households | 14.2% ± 1.4 pp | 13.5% ± 0.1 pp | 12.1% ± 0.1 pp |
| High school graduate or higherDP02_0067PE / DP02_0067PM · Population age 25 and over | 92.6% ± 0.8 pp | 92.1% ± 0.1 pp | 89.6% ± 0.1 pp |
| Bachelor’s degree or higherDP02_0068PE / DP02_0068PM · Population age 25 and over | 16.3% ± 1.1 pp | 32.4% ± 0.2 pp | 35.7% ± 0.2 pp |
| Broadband subscriptionDP02_0154PE / DP02_0154PM · Households | 85.1% ± 1.3 pp | 90.5% ± 0.1 pp | 91.0% ± 0.1 pp |
| DisabilityDP02_0072PE / DP02_0072PM · Civilian noninstitutionalized population | 19.6% ± 0.9 pp | 14.3% ± 0.1 pp | 13.3% ± 0.1 pp |
| Civilian veteransDP02_0070PE / DP02_0070PM · Civilian population age 18 and over | 6.6% ± 0.5 pp | 5.8% ± 0.1 pp | 6.2% ± 0.1 pp |
| Speak English less than very wellDP02_0115PE / DP02_0115PM · Population age 5 and over | 0.5% ± 0.2 ppInterpret with caution: large relative MOE. | 3.7% ± 0.1 pp | 8.6% ± 0.1 pp |
Download free county CSV — one county, all 18 indicators, MOEs, status flags and benchmarks.
Similar population in Michigan
Up to six other counties closest by absolute population difference; these are not geographic neighbors.
- Cass County — 51,520 residents
- Newaygo County — 50,792 residents
- Hillsdale County — 45,654 residents
- Branch County — 45,300 residents
- St. Joseph County — 60,969 residents
- Barry County — 63,409 residents